ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Biomarkers of Importance in Monitoring Heart Condition After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma alarmin S100A8/A9 serves as a potential biomarker of major adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- Interferon-stimulated gene 15 small interfering RNA-loaded polarized mesoporous silica nanocarriers remodel the immune microenvironment to ameliorate post-myocardial infarction heart failure.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Potential of Metabolomic and Proteomic Biomarkers in Cardiology-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of drug response in ischemia reperfusion animal model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite notable advancements in cardiovascular medicine, morbidity and mortality rates associated with myocardial infarction (MI) remain high. The unfavourable prognosis and absence of robust post-MI protocols necessitate further intervention. In this comprehensive review, we will focus on well-established and novel biomarkers that can provide insight into the processes that occur after an ischemic event. More precisely, during the follow-up, it is of particular importance to monitor biomarkers that indicate an increase in myocardial stretch and stress, damage and death of cardiomyocytes, remodelling of the extracellular matrix, oxidative stress, and inflammation. This enables the identification of abnormalities in a timely manner, as well as the capacity to respond promptly to any changes. Therefore, we would like to highlight the importance of well-known markers, such as natriuretic peptides, high-sensitivity troponins, soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2, galactin-3, C-reactive protein, and interleukins in post-MI settings, as well as biomarkers such as adrenomedullin, growth differentiation factor-15, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7, amyloid beta, vitamin D, trimethylamine N-oxide, and advanced glycation end-products that recently emerged in the cardiovascular filed. The implementation of novel post-MI protocols, which encompass the monitoring of the aforementioned biomarkers deemed pertinent, in conjunction with adherence to established cardiac rehabilitation programmes, along with the already well-established therapeutic strategies and control of cardiovascular risk factors, has the potential to markedly enhance patient outcomes and reduce the elevated level of morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.