Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39797344›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging.

Marco Parillo, Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Node-RADS in cervical cancer: a multi-reader agreement and diagnostic performance study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marco ParilloRadiology, Multizonal Unit of Rovereto and Arco, APSS Provincia Autonoma Di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-7118
Carlo Cosimo QuattrocchiRadiology, Multizonal Unit of Rovereto and Arco, APSS Provincia Autonoma Di Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of lymph node (LN) involvement with clinical imaging is a key factor in cancer staging. Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) was introduced in 2021 as a new system specifically tailored for classifying and reporting LNs on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The aim of this review is to compile the scientific evidence that has emerged since the introduction of Node-RADS, with a specific focus on its diagnostic performance and reliability. Node-RADS's performance has been evaluated in various cancer types and anatomical sites, revealing a trend where higher Node-RADS scores correspond to a greater probability of metastatic LN with better diagnostic performances compared to using short axis diameter alone. Moreover, Node-RADS exhibits encouraging diagnostic value for both Node-RADS ≥ 3 and Node-RADS ≥ 4 cutoffs in predicting metastatic LN. In terms of Node-RADS scoring reliability, preliminary studies show promising but partially conflicting results, with agreement levels, mostly between two readers, ranging from fair to almost perfect. This review highlights a wide variation in methodologies across different studies. Thus, to fully realize the potential of Node-RADS in clinical practice, future studies should comprehensively evaluate its diagnostic accuracy, category-specific malignancy rates, and inter-observer agreement. Finally, although limited, promising evidence has suggested the following: a potential prognostic role for Node-RADS; the possible value of diffusion-weighted imaging for LNs classified as Node-RADS ≥ 3; a correlation between Node-RADS and certain texture features in CT; and improved diagnostic performance when Node-RADS is integrated into radiomics or clinical models.

Indexed as

clinical guidelinesclinical oncologycomputed tomographylymphatic metastasismagnetic resonance imagingradiology

Identifiers

PMID39797344
PMCPMC11722337

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.