Evidence mapPaperPMID 39797595Full record

ReviewDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025

Exploring the potential role of C-peptide in type 2 diabetes management.

YeunYi Lin, Rory J McCrimmon, Ewan R Pearson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolution of C-peptide's role in diabetes care.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the potential role of C-peptide in type 2 diabetes management.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

YeunYi LinSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9185-9252
Rory J McCrimmonSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-1981
Ewan R PearsonSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-8585

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex condition characterised by the interaction between insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. C-peptide, a key biomarker of endogenous insulin secretion, has a role in diagnosing type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, its utility in T2D has not been extensively studied. This review provides an overview of the progression of C-peptide levels over time in T2D and discuss its interpretation in clinical settings. We reviewed current evidence on the relationship between C-peptide levels and response to antidiabetic drugs, as well as the utility of C-peptide testing in T2D treatment strategies. We also reviewed available evidence for C-peptide in predicting future outcomes in T2D. In this review, we hoped to clarify the value of C-peptide testing in understanding and managing T2D and to highlight areas where further research is needed.

Indexed as

C-PeptideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansInsulin ResistanceBiomarkersC-PeptideHypoglycemic AgentsC‐peptideinsulin secretiontype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39797595
PMCPMC11823364

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.