ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Attitudes towards vaccination against COVID-19 during pregnancy and its determinants among people of reproductive age.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uptake, willingness, and practices toward seasonal influenza vaccination among healthcare workers in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mpox vaccination hesitancy and its associated factors among the general population in China: A national observational study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Observational
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the vaccinated: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The attitudes of reproductive-age individuals toward COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy are still not well understood. We aimed to explore the attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and the determinants among the Chinese reproductive-age population. An anonymous cross-sectional study was conducted in China from July 4 to August 11, 2023. Structured questionnaires on vaccine hesitancy during pregnancy, socio-demographic characteristics, behavior characteristics, health-related factors, and mental health status were sent online to reproductive-age individuals (both males and females). Among 2966 participants of reproductive age, 86.9% exhibited significant hesitancy toward receiving the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Participants of older age (30-34: aOR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.62-2.52; 35-39: aOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11-2.66), nonsmokers (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.89), with a longer duration since their last COVID-19 vaccination (aOR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.20-4.70), and exhibiting marked pandemic fatigue (moderate: aOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.56-2.52; high: aOR = 3.49, 95% CI: 2.41-5.05) were prone to refuse COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. The presence of generalized anxiety disorder may push the vaccination (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99). The top three reasons for hesitation were concerns about the adverse health effects of vaccines on pregnant women (77.72%), fetuses (72.13%), and newborns/infants (58.77%), respectively. Therefore, under the context of the existing circumstances and the WHO's encouragement, this study provides data support for possible future policy changes and emphasizes the importance of public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.