ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Impact of time from blood specimens collection to centrifugation on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor regarding to 'impact of time from blood specimens collection to centrifugation on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus'.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Response to letter regarding 'impact of time from blood specimens collection to centrifugation on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus'.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Fasting Metabolite Panel for OGTT-Free Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Machine Learning Approach Validated in Dual Cohorts.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe process of glycolysis from blood collection to centrifugation impacts the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, the specific characteristics of the working environment in China and its influence on GDM diagnosis still need to be clarified.
methodsFirstly, 15 pregnant women were recruited, and six specimens were collected from each in a fasting state. The specimens were left at room temperature for different times (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h) and then centrifuged. Subsequently, data were collected from pregnant women who underwent oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between June 1, 2021, and July 30, 2022. Pregnant women were categorized into different groups based on different pre-treatment times, and the incidence of GDM was calculated for each group.
resultsGlucose levels gradually decreased as the specimen remained longer before centrifugation, a decrease of 1.15 mmol/L (27.58%) from the initial glucose level (3.02 ± 0.30 mmol/L
conclusionsIn the Chinese healthcare environment, prolonging specimen pre-treatment time can affect GDM diagnosis. Therefore, standardizing specimen pre-treatment is crucial to minimize potential effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.