Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39799164›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging explainable AI and large-scale datasets for comprehensive classification of renal histologic types.

Seung Wan Moon, Jisup Kim, Young Jae Kim, Sung Hyun Kim, Chi Sung An, Kwang Gi Kim, Chan Kwon Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seung Wan Moon *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-medical Course, College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, 38-13 3beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Korea.
Jisup Kim *Department of Pathology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Dokjeom-ro 3beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Korea.
Young Jae KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-medical Course, College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, 38-13 3beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Korea.
Sung Hyun KimDepartment of AI Data, National Information Society Agency(NIA), 53 Cheomdan-ro, Dong- gu, Deagu, Korea.
Chi Sung AnUrban Datalab, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute Convergence Center, 218 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Deajeon, Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Pre-medical Course, College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, 38-13 3beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 21565, Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.
Chan Kwon JungDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Korea. ckjung@catholic.ac.kr.

Funding

Gyeonggi-do Regional Research Center GRRC-Gachon2023(B01)Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2021-KH113146Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy K_G012001187801National Research Foundation of Korea No. RS-2022-00166555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, as the number of cancer patients has increased, much research is being conducted for efficient treatment, including the use of artificial intelligence in genitourinary pathology. Recent research has focused largely on the classification of renal cell carcinoma subtypes. Nonetheless, the broader categorization of renal tissue into non-neoplastic normal tissue, benign tumor and malignant tumor remains understudied. This gap in research can primarily be attributed to the limited availability of extensive datasets including benign tumor and normal tissue in addition to specific type of renal cell carcinoma, which hampers the ability to conduct comprehensive studies in these broader categories. This research introduces a model aimed at classifying renal tissue into three primary categories: normal (non-neoplastic), benign tumor, and malignant tumor. Utilizing digital pathology while slide images (WSIs) from nephrectomy specimens of 2,535 patients from multiple institutions, the model provides a foundational approach for distinguishing these key tissue types. The study utilized a dataset of 12,223 WSIs comprising 1,300 WSIs of normal tissue, 700 WSIs of benign tumors, and 10,223 WSIs of malignant tumors. Employing the ResNet-18 architecture and a Multiple Instance Learning approach, the model demonstrated high accuracy, with F1-scores of 0.934 (CI: 0.933-0.934) for normal tissue, 0.684 (CI: 0.682-0.687) for benign tumors, and 0.878 (CI: 0.877-0.879) for malignant tumors. The overall performance was also notable, achieving a weighted average F1-score of 0.879 (CI: 0.879-0.880) and a weighted average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.969 (CI: 0.969-0.969). This model significantly aids in the swift and accurate diagnosis of renal tissue, encompassing non-neoplastic normal tissue, benign tumor, and malignant tumor.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, Renal CellKidneyKidney NeoplasmsHumansROC CurveDeep learningDigital pathologyMultiple instance learningRenal tumor classification

Identifiers

PMID39799164
PMCPMC11724863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.