Evidence mapPaperPMID 39799220Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A multilevel social network approach to studying multiple disease-prevention behaviors.

András Vörös, Elisa Bellotti, Carinthia Balabet Nengnong, Mattimi Passah, Quinnie Doreen Nongrum, Charishma Khongwir, Anna Maria van Eijk, Anne Kessler, Rajiv Sarkar, Jane M Carlton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

András Vörös *School of Social Policy and Society, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. a.voros@bham.ac.uk.
Elisa Bellotti *Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. elisa.bellotti@manchester.ac.uk.
Carinthia Balabet NengnongIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Mattimi PassahIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Quinnie Doreen NongrumIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Charishma KhongwirIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Anna Maria van EijkCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, USA.
Anne KesslerCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, USA.
Rajiv SarkarIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.
Jane M CarltonCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, USA.
Sandra AlbertIndian Institute of Public Health Shillong, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089676NIH HHS U19AI089676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective prevention of many infectious and non-infectious diseases relies on people concurrently adopting multiple prevention behaviors. Individual characteristics, opinion leaders, and social networks have been found to explain why people take up specific prevention behaviors. However, it remains challenging to understand how these factors shape multiple interdependent behaviors. We propose a multilevel social network framework that allows us to study the effects of individual and social factors on multiple disease prevention behaviors simultaneously. We apply this approach to examine the factors explaining eight malaria prevention behaviors, using unique interview data collected from 1529 individuals in 10 hard-to-reach, malaria-endemic villages in Meghalaya, India in 2020-2022. Statistical network modelling reveals exposure to similar behaviors in one's social network as the most important factor explaining prevention behaviors. Further, we find that households indirectly shape behaviors as key contexts for social ties. Together, these two factors are crucial for explaining the observed patterns of behaviors and social networks in the data, outweighing individual characteristics, opinion leaders, and social network size. The results highlight that social network processes may facilitate or hamper disease prevention efforts that rely on a combination of behaviors. Our approach is well suited to study these processes in the context of various diseases.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorMalariaSocial NetworkingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39799220
PMCPMC11724947

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.