ReviewJournal of public health policy2025
An integrated framework to guide evidence-informed public health policymaking.
Review in Journal of public health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The development process of a regional dementia strategy: a Delphi study and deliberative dialogues.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Managers' experiences of collaboration and individual participation in integrated healthcare and social services for adults with complex needs: a focus group study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The influence of policy narratives on evidence-informed decision-making in health policy - an analysis of Swedish healthcare policies from 1992 to 2024.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Rethinking the role of health technology assessment: from gatekeeper to health system shaper.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Bridging Gaps in Oral Health Frameworks: Mapping With Hodges' Health Career - Care Domains - Model.Journal of public health dentistry · 2026Review
- Article
- Defining advocacy in public health: a scoping review to inform policy, training, and equity-oriented action.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Defining Competencies for Policymaking in Public Health: A Scoping Review on the State-of- The-Art.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- Evidence-informed policies: tools for decision-making in the Brazilian Unified Health System.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026Article
- Governing Evidence in Contentious Times: A GUARD Framework for Public Health Leadership.Public health reviews · 2026Article
- A contemporary approach to developing health policies: the Dubai Health Authority as a case study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Stakeholders' views on the development and adoption of health policies related to pharmacist scope of practice and the pharmacy practice environment in Australia.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Safe harboring and governance: Lakota relational systems as context for women's health integration.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- From pathogens to policy: using network analysis to map the knowledge base on human-zoonotic disease dynamics underpinning global pandemic policy.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Article
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-informed policymaking emphasizes that policy decisions should be informed by the best available evidence from research and follow a systematic and transparent approach. For public health policymaking we can learn from existing practices of transparent, evidence-informed decision-making for clinical practice, medicines, and medical technology. We review existing evidence-to-decision frameworks, as well as frameworks and theories for policymaking to address the political dimension of policymaking, and use this analysis to propose an integrated framework to guide evidence-informed policymaking. The framework includes nine decision-making criteria and allows for the addition of other context-specific criteria. It also emphasizes elements of the decision-making process that can give greater legitimacy, fairness, and transparency to the policy decision, such as the use of deliberative processes and assessment of conflicts of interest. We offer the framework as a tool to help government policy makers use evidence in a structured and transparent way when making decisions about public health policy options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.