ArticleImmunologic research2025
The role of mitophagy-related genes in prognosis and immunotherapy of cutaneous melanoma: a comprehensive analysis based on single-cell RNA sequencing and machine learning.
Article in Immunologic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitophagy-driven multidimensional regulation of tumor immune evasion and context-dependent therapeutic strategies.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Mitophagy-driven immune evasion in skin cancer: multidimensional regulatory networks and context-dependent therapeutic strategies-a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Astaxanthin supplementation in Arabian racing horses mitigates oxidative stress and inflammation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells through enhanced mitophagy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Igniting Cold Tumors: Multi-Omics-Driven Strategies to Overcome Immune Evasion and Restore Immune Surveillance.Oncology research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mitophagy, the selective degradation of mitochondria by autophagy, plays a crucial role in cancer progression and therapy response. This study aims to elucidate the role of mitophagy-related genes (MRGs) in cutaneous melanoma (CM) through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and machine learning approaches, ultimately developing a predictive model for patient prognosis. The scRNA-seq data, bulk transcriptomic data, and clinical data of CM were obtained from publicly available databases. The single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were used to identify gene modules associated with mitophagy phenotypes. A machine learning framework employing ten different algorithms was used to develop the prognostic model. Based on scRNA-seq data, we identified 16 distinct cell subpopulations in melanoma, and melanoma cells exhibited significantly higher mitophagy scores. The turquoise module identified via WGCNA showed the strongest correlation with mitophagy scores. A prognostic model incorporating seven genes was developed through machine learning algorithms, achieving an average C-index of 0.754 across training and validation cohorts. Functionally, low-risk patients were enriched in interferon-gamma response and inflammatory processes, whereas high-risk patients showed enrichment in glycolysis regulation and signaling pathways such as KRAS and Wnt/β-catenin. Notably, low-risk patients demonstrated enhanced immune infiltration and greater sensitivity to immunotherapy. RT-qPCR validated the expression level of 7 model genes in human melanoma cell lines and normal melanocyte cell lines. Our study provides a comprehensive understanding of MRGs in melanoma and presents a novel prognostic model. These findings enhance our understanding of the tumor microenvironment and may guide personalized treatment strategies for CM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39799269What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.