ArticleScientific reports2025
Major individual and regional variations in unit entrainment by oscillations of different frequencies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro studies have shown that a neuron's electroresponsive properties can predispose it to oscillate at specific frequencies. In contrast, network activity in vivo can entrain neurons to rhythms that their biophysical properties do not predispose them to favor. However, there is limited information on the comparative frequency profile of unit entrainment across brain regions. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the frequency profile of unit entrainment in cortex, thalamus, striatum, and basolateral amygdala (BLA) in rats of either sex. Neurons recorded simultaneously in a given brain region and behavioral state generally had very similar frequency profiles of unit entrainment. While cortical, striatal, and thalamic neurons were more strongly entrained by low than high local field potential (LFP) frequencies, increases in the power of these oscillations were linked to decreased firing rates for low frequencies versus increased firing rates for high frequencies. Deviating from this general trend, BLA neurons were more strongly entrained by high gamma than all other frequency bands in all subjects and states. By contrast, neurons in other regions displayed marked inter-individual variability. That is, although neurons in some regions had exceptionally high entrainment values in particular frequency bands, these were not observed consistently across rats. Based on these findings, some might infer that oscillations play a minor role or that different oscillatory patterns can support the same functions. Alternatively, the oscillations critical to brain function could be those not investigated here, namely those arising transiently in response to specific task variables or contexts. Perhaps those are less susceptible to genetic variations. While our findings do not allow us to determine which explanation is correct, they do highlight the perils of averaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.