ArticleResearch square2024
Malaria among febrile patients suspected of Yellow fever during an outbreak in Ghana.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Between October 2021 and February 2022, there was an outbreak of Yellow fever that spread within several districts in the northern part of Ghana. Febrile illnesses such as Yellow fever are often misdiagnosed as malaria and vice versa, which delays appropriate management and treatment. Hence, the true burden of Yellow fever and malaria are mostly underestimated. This study investigated the epidemiology of malaria in febrile patients suspected of Yellow fever in and around the epicenter of a Yellow fever outbreak in Ghana. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional study conducted in two outbreak sites (Wenchi and Damongo) and two non-outbreak sites (Kumbungu and Tamale). A total of 498 febrile patients from healthcare facilities were recruited in the rainy and dry seasons. A structured questionnaire was administered to collect patients' demographic information. Venous blood was collected from consented study participants for malaria parasite detection via microscopy and PCR. Total RNA was extracted from serum samples for the detection of yellow fever virus using Reverse Transcriptase PCR. Results: None of the patients tested positive for Yellow fever virus. Out of the 498 participants tested for plasmodium parasites, 98 (19.7%) were microscopy positive while 92 (29.7%) were PCR positive. Plasmodium prevalence via microscopy was significantly higher in the dry season, 42 (18.67%) compared to the rainy season, 12 (4.4%) ( Conclusion: High malaria prevalence was found in the study sites, affecting preschool and the school-aged children the most. Although Yellow fever was not detected, its overlap with malaria in Ghana, suggests the importance of enhancing surveillance for both diseases to better prevent and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.