ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Implementing novel complete blood count-derived inflammatory indices in the diabetic kidney diseases diagnostic models.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association Between CBC-Derived Inflammatory Indicators and 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Cohort Study From the MIMIC-IV Database.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- The Inflammation Effect in the Association Between Bilirubin and Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Hemogram inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), red-cell distribution width (RDW), and mean platelet volume (MPV) have been associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications, namely diabetic kidney diseases (DKD). We aimed to develop and validate logistic regression (LR) and CatBoost diagnostic models and study the role of adding these markers to the models. Methods: All individuals who were managed in our secondary care center from March 2020 to December 2023 were identified. After excluding the ineligible patients, train-test splitting, and data preprocessing, two baseline LR and CatBoost-based models were developed using demographic, clinical, and laboratory features. The AUC-ROC of the models with biomarkers (NLR, PLR, RDW, and MPV) was compared to the baseline models. We calculated net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination index (IDI). Results: One thousand and eleven T2DM patients were eligible. The AUC-ROC of both LR (0.738) and CatBoost (0.715) models was comparable. Adding target inflammatory markers did not significantly change the AUC-ROC in both LR and CatBoost models. Adding RDW to the baseline LR model reclassified 41.7% of patients without DKD, in the cost of misclassification of 38.4% of DKD cases. This change was absent in CatBoost models, and other markers did not achieve improved NRI or IDI. Conclusion: The basic models with demographical and clinical features had acceptable performance. Adding RDW to the basic LR model improved the reclassification of the non-DKD participants. However, adding other hematological indices did not significantly improve the LR and CatBoost models' performance. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01523-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.