ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Delivery of Hydrogels: A Novel Strategy for Treating Early-Stage Gastrointestinal Tumors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: clinical features and independent predictors of histopathological confirmation via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/fine-needle biopsy.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- 19-Gauge Versus 22-Gauge Franseen Needles, Comparison of the Histological Diagnostic Capability of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical utility of macroscopic on-site evaluation in EUS-guided tissue acquisition for autoimmune pancreatitis: A retrospective study.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Diagnostic value of EUS-guided tissue acquisition in suspected autoimmune pancreatitis: A 15-year single-center retrospective study.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Does endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging challenge EUS?Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: EUS is recommended for guiding pancreatic tissue acquisition in suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) cases. However, there is a lack of comparative research on the effectiveness between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing AIP in China. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) specifically for type 1 AIP. Methods: Between 2010 and 2023, individuals with AIP who received EUS-TA at Changhai Hospital were included in the study. Results: A total of 173 patients diagnosed with AIP who underwent EUS-TA were included in the final analysis. Of these, 104 patients (60.1%) received EUS-FNA, and 69 patients (39.9%) underwent EUS-FNB. Sufficient pancreatic tissue samples (>5 cells/high-power field) were obtained in 164 of 173 patients (94.8%), with success rates of 94.2% for EUS-FNA and 95.7% for EUS-FNB ( Conclusions: EUS-FNB demonstrates higher rates of level 1 and level 2 histopathological findings, as well as more abundant IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration, compared with EUS-FNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.