ReviewCirculation reports2025
Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.
Review in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with conventional Western medicine for post-AMI heart failure: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of 62 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Inhaled Nitric Oxide During ECPELLA Weaning: Interpreting Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index Beyond a Single Number.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy and Changes in Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Weaning in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring ECPELLA.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Beyond Survival: Reframing Palliative Care in Survivors of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Initial intra-aortic balloon pump versus Impella support strategies and short-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a MIMIC-IV cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Impact of concomitant intra-aortic balloon pump support on outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with veno-arterial ECMO: a propensity-matched analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Cardiogenic Shock.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the Shock Team on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Implementation and Challenges of Early-Phase Physiotherapy During Cardiovascular Intensive Care.Circulation reports · 2026Review
- Comparative Efficacy of Noradrenaline vs. Other Vasopressors on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Long Inflation at Stent Deployment in Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Preventive Effect of Nifekalant on Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation and Electrical Storm - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic Impact of the Difference of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Clinical Importance of Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors on Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Priorities for Early Revascularization or Introduction of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Use of a Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2025Article
- Combined Risk Stratification With Patient Characteristics and Biomarkers in Patients Treated With the Impella for Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to recent advances in early reperfusion and pharmacological therapies, the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has considerably improved over the past decades. However, the mortality rate remains high at ~40-50% after AMI when complicated by cardiogenic shock. Although immediate coronary revascularization of the infarct-related artery has been the only evidence-based treatment, temporary mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) has become another therapeutic option supported by randomized trial data in highly selected patients. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning clinical challenges in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.