Evidence mapPaperPMID 39802129Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2025

Verification of the Impact of Changes in the Severity Classification of Proteinuria on the Prognosis of Hypertensive Patients Following the Initiation of Esaxerenone.

Takashi Kitao, Eriko Konishi, Noriaki Itoh, Ayumu Hirata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Takashi KitaoDepartment of Cardiology, Minoh City Hospital Osaka Japan.
Eriko KonishiDepartment of Cardiology, Minoh City Hospital Osaka Japan.
Noriaki ItohDepartment of Cardiology, Minoh City Hospital Osaka Japan.
Ayumu HirataDepartment of Diabetes/Endocrinology and Metabolism, Minoh City Hospital Osaka Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) or urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) has been reported as predictors of cardiovascular and renal events. We aimed to evaluate the impact of changes in proteinuria severity on the prognosis of hypertensive patients post-esaxerenone initiation. Methods and Results: Hypertensive patients who commenced esaxerenone (n=164) were classified into 3 groups according to baseline UACR or UPCR, based on the modified proteinuria severity classification: A1 (normal; n=35); A2 (microalbuminuria/mild proteinuria; n=49); and A3 (macroalbuminuria/severe proteinuria; n=80). At 6 months post-esaxerenone initiation, these patients were then reclassified into 3 groups: Á1 (n=48); Á2 (n=66); and Á3 (n=50). Á2 was further subdivided into 2 groups: Á2a (n=34); and Á2b (n=32), the latter representing patients who improved from A3. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of cardiovascular and renal death, heart failure hospitalization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, initiation of dialysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate decline exceeding 40%. Severity of proteinuria improved significantly after 6 months (P=0.003). The incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in Á3 compared with Á1 (log-rank P<0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between Á1 and Á2b (log-rank P=0.12). Conclusions: Esaxerenone may ameliorate proteinuria severity and improve the prognosis of patients with macroalbuminuria or severe proteinuria.

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaEsaxerenoneHypertensionPrognosisProteinuria

Identifiers

PMID39802129
PMCPMC11711787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.