ArticlePeerJ2025
Identification of crucial extracellular genes as potential biomarkers in newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, we aimed to study the role of extracellular proteins as biomarkers associated with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes (NT1D) diagnosis and prognosis. Patients and Methods: We retrieved and analyzed the GSE55098 microarray dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Using R software, we screened out the extracellular protein-differentially expressed genes (EP-DEGs) through several protein-related databases. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were applied to describe the role and function of these EP-DEGs. We used the STRING database to construct the interaction of proteins, Cytoscape software to visualize the protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, and its plugin CytoHubba to identify the crucial genes between PPI networks. Finally, we used the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD) to evaluate the connection between NT1D with the potential crucial genes and we validated our conclusions with another dataset (GSE33440) and some clinical samples. Results: We identified 422 DEGs and 122 EP-DEGs from a dataset that includes (12) NT1D patients compared with (10) healthy people. Protein digestion and absorption, toll-like receptor signaling, and T cell receptor signaling were the most meaningful pathways defined by KEGG enrichment analyses. We recognized nine important extracellular genes: Conclusion: The nine identified key extracellular genes, particularly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.