ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
A human skin-on-a-chip platform for microneedling-driven skin cancer treatment.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing intradermal vaccine delivery: Focus on hollow microneedles and skin models.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Engineering skin microphysiological systems for transdermal drug screening based on strategic model selection and quantitative prediction roadmaps.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Research advances on protein-based microneedles for treatment of skin diseases: A review.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Research Progress on Construction Technology of 3D Human Skin Models and Its Application Prospects in Dermatology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A semi-analytical approach for solving a fractional-order mathematical model of skin cell damage and repair driven by environmental pollutants.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Collagen Type I as a Biological Barrier Interface in Biomimetic Microfluidic Devices: Properties, Applications, and Challenges.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing transdermal drug delivery through 4D bioprinting and dynamic skin modelling.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2026Review
- Cracking the Skin Barrier: Models and Methods Driving Dermal Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- High-Throughput 3D Bioprinted Organoids of Skin Cancer Utilized for Diagnosis and Personalized Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Bioengineered microneedles and nanomedicine as therapeutic platform for tissue regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Alternatives Integrating Omics Approaches for the Advancement of Human Skin Models: A Focus on Metagenomics, Metatranscriptomics, and Metaproteomics.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Advancing cancer research through 3D cell culture models.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin-on-a-chip models provide physiologically relevant platforms for studying diseases and drug evaluation, replicating the native skin structures and functions more accurately than traditional 2D or simple 3D cultures. However, challenges remain in creating models suitable for microneedling applications and monitoring, as well as developing skin cancer models for analysis and targeted therapy. Here, we developed a human skin/skin cancer-on-a-chip platform within a microfluidic device using bioprinting/bioengineering techniques. The fabricated skin models include vascular, dermal, and epidermal layers, demonstrating increased functionalities and maturation of dermal (Collagen I & Fibronectin for 7 days) as well as epidermal (Filaggrin & Keratin 10, 14, and 19 at the air-liquid interface (ALI) for 21 days) layers. Histological analysis confirmed the formation of a differentiated epidermis and ridges at the dermal-epidermal junction in our model, closely resembling native skin tissue. Melanoma cells were embedded approximately 400 μm beneath the epidermis to simulate tumor invasion into the dermis. The platform was further used to test doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) microneedles (MNs) for localized transdermal drug delivery targeting melanoma. The DOX-loaded MNs penetrated uniformly to a depth of approximately 600 μm, effectively reaching the melanoma cells. Drug delivery via MNs demonstrated significantly higher efficiency than diffusion through media flow, confirming the practicality and robustness of the proposed model for future therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.