Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803009›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Metformin Hydrochloride and Myo-Inositol Compared to Metformin in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Alka Kriplani, Parikshit Tank, Purnima Singh, Neha Maini, Shymala Kaitala, Lakshmi Kantha G, Joydip Paul, Sushma Shah, Urvashi Bhatara, Archana Sinha and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alka KriplaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Paras Health, Gurugram, IND.
Parikshit TankDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ashwini Maternity and Surgical Hospital, Mumbai, IND.
Purnima SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pushpanjali Hospital, Agra, IND.
Neha MainiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charak Hospital and Research Center, Lucknow, IND.
Shymala KaitalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, IND.
Lakshmi Kantha GDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysuru, IND.
Joydip PaulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, IND.
Sushma ShahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheth V.S. General Hospital and Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Urvashi BhataraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, N.R.R. Hospital, Bangalore, IND.
Archana SinhaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, IND.
Taruna SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vatsalya Hospital Multispeciality Center, Varanasi, IND.
Shalini SrivastavaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Om Surgical Center and Maternity Home, Varanasi, IND.
Abhijeet MalviDepartment of Medical Affairs, Eris Lifesciences Ltd., Ahmedabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) poses a significant health concern among reproductive-aged women and is characterized by ovarian dysfunction, hyperandrogenism, and insulin resistance. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of metformin and myo-inositol combination therapy compared to metformin monotherapy in patients with PCOS. Materials and methods This was a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 196 patients with PCOS were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a fixed-dose combination of metformin hydrochloride 500 mg and myo-inositol 600 mg (Met-Myo) or metformin 500 mg alone (Met) twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary study endpoints were improvement in insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, HOMA-IR) at week 24 and improvement in menstrual cycle disturbances at 12 and 24 weeks. Results The Met-Myo combination demonstrated a significantly superior response with 63 (75%) patients showing improvement in HOMA-IR compared to 54 (60.67%) in the Met group (p = 0.049) at week 24. The improvement in the number of patients with heavy menstrual blood flow (>80 mL) was significantly greater in the Met-Myo group (four patients, 4.76%) compared to the Met group (six patients, 6.74%) at week 24 (p = 0.029). Improvement in the percentage of patients with normal menstrual frequency and infrequent menstruation from baseline to week 24 was significantly greater in the Met-Myo group compared to the Met group (p = 0.049). Safety assessments revealed a low and comparable incidence of mild adverse events. Conclusion Metformin-myo-inositol combination therapy is superior to metformin monotherapy in addressing menstrual irregularities and improving insulin resistance in PCOS patients, thereby providing a promising avenue for optimizing the management of PCOS.

Indexed as

insulin resistancemenstrual irregularitymetforminmyo-inositolpolycystic ovary syndrome (pcos)

Identifiers

PMID39803009
PMCPMC11725314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.