ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2024
Using Artificial Intelligence in the Comprehensive Management of Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in the acute and sub-acute phases of spinal cord injury- a systematic review.Spinal cord · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: Neurophysiological Basis and Severity-Based Clinical Framework.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Innovative Assistive Technologies for Tetraplegia: A Narrative Review of Systematic and Emerging Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Intramedullary Neural Stem Cell Transplantation in Spinal Cord Injury: Timing, Targets, and Techniques.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Review
- Letter to the Editor: Commentary on Using Artificial Intelligence in the Comprehensive Management of Spinal Cord Injury (Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Article
- Review
- Nutritional alterations, adverse consequences, and comprehensive assessment in spinal cord injury: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- A narrative review of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently results in persistent motor, sensory, or autonomic dysfunction, and the outcomes are largely determined by the location and severity of the injury. Despite significant technological progress, the intricate nature of the spinal cord anatomy and the difficulties associated with neuroregeneration make full recovery from SCI uncommon. This review explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), with a particular focus on machine learning, to enhance patient outcomes in SCI management. The application of AI, specifically machine learning, has revolutionized the diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and rehabilitation of patients with SCI. By leveraging large datasets and identifying complex patterns, AI contributes to improved diagnostic accuracy, optimizes surgical procedures, and enables the personalization of therapeutic interventions. AI-driven prognostic models provide accurate predictions of recovery, facilitating improved planning and resource allocation. Additionally, AI-powered rehabilitation systems, including robotic devices and brain-computer interfaces, increase the effectiveness and accessibility of therapy. However, realizing the full potential of AI in SCI care requires ongoing research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the development of comprehensive datasets. As AI continues to evolve, it is expected to play an increasingly vital role in enhancing the outcomes of patients with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.