Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803405›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Wide field imaging biomarkers: A different perspective.

Sakshi Shiromani, Niveditha Pattathil, Elham Sadeghi, Netan Choudhry, Jay Chhablani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sakshi ShiromaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Niveditha PattathilVitreous Retina Macula Specialists of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elham SadeghiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Netan ChoudhryVitreous Retina Macula Specialists of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jay ChhablaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wide field retinal imaging has emerged as a transformative technology over the last few decades, revolutionizing our ability to visualize the intricate landscape of the retina. By capturing expansive retinal areas, these techniques offer a panoramic view going beyond traditional imaging methods. In this review, we explore the significance of retinal imaging-based biomarkers to help diagnose ocular and systemic conditions. We discuss quantitative biomarkers, including ischemic index, nonperfusion area and more, and their application in diabetic retinopathy, central retinal vein occlusion, neurodegenerative diseases, and more. In addition, we outline qualitative biomarkers such as choroidal venous hyperpermeability and intervortex anastomoses. The role of wide field fundus autofluorescence in assessing hereditary retinal diseases is also emphasized. Standardized imaging procedures, professional collaboration, and validation across a range of clinical circumstances are necessary for the effective use of these biomarkers. They have the potential to transform disease identification, risk assessment, and customize therapy.

Indexed as

Biomarkersqualitative biomarkersquantitative biomarkersretinal imagingwide field

Identifiers

PMID39803405
PMCPMC11717343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.