ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A genetic algorithm for self-supervised models of oscillatory neurodynamics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predictive processing theories propose that the brain supervises itself, to build an internal model of its environment. This internal model emerges by minimizing the prediction error, the discrepancy between internally generated predictions and external sensory signals. Empirically, this internal model is implemented with neurobiology and generates neurodynamics, especially oscillatory rhythms. In current approaches, there exists a trade-off between algorithmic and implementational aspects. One group of predictive processing models perform self-supervised computations but miss neurobiologic details and oscillatory neurodynamics. In the other group, biophysical models implement neural network models with maximal brain-like structure and oscillatory dynamics but require manual supervision. Here, we propose an evolutionary algorithm, the genetic stochastic delta rule (GSDR), to conduct simulations with biophysical neural networks. This approach enhances the explanatory power of theories in neurophysiology by exploring parameter spaces in a self-supervised fashion. We first evaluate GSDR in a simplified and minimal optimization problem. Then, we simulate commonly observed neural dynamics such as firing rate and modulation of neuronal oscillations. We show that GSDR is capable of replicating oscillatory dynamics observed through in-vivo electrophysiology, such that they emerge from synaptic plasticity. This methodology broadens the scope for biology-plausible, automated, large-scale and multi-objective simulations within computational neuroscience. With this virtuous cycle between data and models established by GSDR, we suggest that the search for the circuits underlying predictive processing can be grounded to neuronal data, improving the neurobiological basis of theories.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.