Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803866›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2025

Do We Have Sufficient Evidence to Derive Innovative Approaches to Assessing Unmet Need, Delivering Education on Bladder and Bowel Continence Health, and Providing a Better Environment for Joint Decision-Making? ICI-RS 2024.

Nikki Cotterill, Michael Samarinas, Angie Rantell, Caroline Selai, Salvador Arlandis, Kathryn Jones, Paul Abrams, D Robinson, Adrian Wagg

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikki CotterillSchool of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6921-2712
Michael SamarinasUrology and Urodynamics Unit, University General Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo Larissa, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-795X
Angie RantellDepartment of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-5352
Caroline SelaiDepartment of Uro-Neurology, Queen Square Institute of Neurology & Psychologist, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery/UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-3405
Salvador ArlandisDepartment of Urology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia University, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1224-9423
Kathryn JonesBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4412-7745
Paul AbramsBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2776-2200
D RobinsonDepartment of Urogynaecology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4879-6672
Adrian WaggDepartment of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5372-530X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextImproved continence outcomes are reliant on identification of unmet need, education delivery, and shared decision-making. The evidence base on which to derive innovative approaches in these areas was unclear.

methodsA debate held at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society meeting, held in Bristol in June 2024, considered ways to improve research requirements to advance these areas. RESULTS AND

conclusionArtificial intelligence solutions and digital approaches to healthcare are emerging at pace and offer possibilities to improve these three key areas but this must be driven by person-centered approaches. Care must be taken to avoid increasing inequality through digital exclusion and language barriers. Research questions are highlighted to derive innovation in these three key areas.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedFecal IncontinenceHealth Services Needs and DemandPatient Education as TopicUrinary IncontinenceArtificial IntelligenceHumanscontinence educationcontinence promotionincontinenceshared decision‐makingunmet need

Identifiers

PMID39803866
PMCPMC11920929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.