ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2025
Bilingual Perspectives of Functional Dyspepsia Management in People From Underserved Areas.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDisorders of gut-brain interaction, such as functional dyspepsia (FD), are prevalent and challenging conditions. In other gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, individuals from underserved areas (UAs) have difficulty accessing care. Little is known about UA FD patient perspectives of their care, especially in those with limited English proficiency. We aimed to characterize patients' experiences with FD management with the goal of informing future studies targeting disorders of gut-brain interaction management in potentially vulnerable communities residing in UAs.
methodsParticipants meeting FD criteria were identified in 2 community health centers affiliated with a large academic medical center in the Northeastern United States. Semistructured interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Transcripts were reviewed by a bilingual panel of investigators using the constant comparative method of iterative data acquisition. Psychosocial stressors and GI symptom severity were assessed.
resultsA total of 26 participants were interviewed (12 English-speaking and 14 Spanish-speaking). Broadly, GI symptoms were mild and there was mild-to-moderate psychological distress present. Adverse social determinants of health were highly prevalent. Despite mild symptom severity on objective scales, FD severely affected quality of life and interfered with physical, psychological, and social well-being, including avoidance of certain foods and professional/social situations. Study participants (particularly those with limited English proficiency status) reported difficulty in receiving care. Thematic saturation was achieved. DISCUSSION: Even when symptoms were mild, interviewees from UAs reported significant FD-related impairment, along with psychological distress. Education interventions targeting FD-related care in UAs should be designed to improve shared decision making in FD, sensitive to the burden of social determinants of health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.