Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804143›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Exploring the potential of compound-protein complex structure-free models in virtual screening using BlendNet.

Sangmin Seo, Hwanhee Kim, Jieun Lee, Seungyeon Choi, Sanghyun Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sangmin SeoDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hwanhee KimDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jieun LeeDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seungyeon ChoiDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sanghyun ParkDepartment of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, 03722, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5196-6193

Funding

MSIT RS-2023-00229822National Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying new compounds that interact with a target is a crucial time-limiting step in the initial phases of drug discovery. Compound-protein complex structure-based affinity prediction models can expedite this process; however, their dependence on high-quality three-dimensional (3D) complex structures limits their practical application. Prediction models that do not require 3D complex structures for binding-affinity estimation offer a theoretically attractive alternative; however, accurately predicting affinity without interaction information presents significant challenges. We introduce BlendNet, a framework that employs a knowledge transfer strategy to improve affinity prediction accuracy by learning the interdependent relationships between compounds and proteins without relying on 3D complex structures. Compared with state-of-the-art models for affinity prediction, BlendNet demonstrated superior performance across various cold-start cases. The ability of BlendNet to interpret compound-protein interactions without utilizing complex structure data highlights its potential to accelerate and streamline drug development.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProteinsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProteinsattention mechanismbinding affinityinteraction interpretabilityknowledge distillationmultiobjective learningvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID39804143
PMCPMC11726592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.