ReviewHeart failure reviews2025
Focusing on microvascular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional consequences of diminished myocardial oxygen delivery per beat in experimental heart failure.Basic research in cardiology · 2026Article
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Women: Sex-Specific Insights Across the Continuum from Diagnosis to Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Acute Heart Failure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Pathophysiology of HFpEF: Insights from a Metabolic-Mitochondrial Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Correlation of the triglyceride-glucose index with major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with acute myocardial infarction combined with HFpEF.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure is a prevalent global health issue. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which already represents half of all heart cases worldwide, is projected to further increase, driven by aging populations and rising cardiovascular risk factors. Effective therapies for HFpEF remain limited, particularly due to its pathophysiological heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of underlying pathomechanisms and implications. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), characterized by structural and functional changes in the coronary microcirculation, is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in HFpEF even though the exact nature of their causal relationship is still unclear. This review explores prevalence, prognostic implications, and potential therapeutic targets for CMD in HFpEF. CMD's role in HFpEF might involve impaired coronary blood flow regulation, leading to myocardial ischemia, impaired relaxation, and/or adverse remodeling. Vice versa, increased wall stress in patients with HFpEF might elevate coronary resistances, further worsening microvascular perfusion. Finally, abnormalities in substrate metabolism might cause both CMD and HFpEF. Current treatments, including pharmacotherapy and device-based therapies, show limited success, highlighting the need for more targeted approaches. New possible therapies, such as the coronary sinus reducer device, may show promise in improving myocardial perfusion and function. However, further large-scale studies are required to elucidate the mechanistic links between CMD and HFpEF and to develop specialized treatments for distinct heart failure phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.