ReviewJournal of cardiovascular translational research2025
CRISPR-Cas9 Targeting PCSK9: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Atherosclerosis.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Endothelial Cell-Derived PCSK9 in Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiological Roles and Therapeutic Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Targeted drug delivery systems for atherosclerosis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology, as an innovative biomedical tool, holds significant potential in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis. By precisely editing key genes such as PCSK9, CRISPR-Cas9 offers the possibility of long-term regulation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Early clinical studies of gene editing therapies like VERVE-101 have yielded encouraging results, highlighting both the feasibility and potential efficacy of this technology. However, clinical applications still face challenges such as off-target effects, immunogenicity, and long-term safety. Future research should focus on enhancing the specificity and efficiency of gene editing, optimizing delivery systems, and improving personalized treatment strategies. Additionally, the establishment of ethical and legal regulatory frameworks will be critical for the safe adoption of this technology. With the continued advancement of gene editing technology, CRISPR-Cas9 may become an important tool for treating atherosclerosis and other complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39804565What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.