ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
AI Interventions to Alleviate Healthcare Shortages and Enhance Work Conditions in Critical Care: Qualitative Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Promoting Positive Nursing Practice Environments: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- AI-Based EMG Reporting: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Caregiver Preferences for AI-Supported Telemedicine in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Journal of palliative care · 2026Article
- Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence, Career Engagement, and Intrinsic Motivation Among Healthcare Workers in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study of Indirect Associations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Technologies, Applicability, and Trade-Offs of AI in Palliative Care for Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Clinician Burnout in the United States: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Human-AI Collaboration in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Real-World Data Needs Real-World Doctors: When Automation Advances Faster Than Clinical Workflow.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Workflow Bottlenecks and Staff Readiness in an NHS Emergency Urology Clinic: A Prospective Service Evaluation to Inform Future AI-Supported Triage.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Program Theory and Core Outcome Set Development for a Technology-Assisted Counseling Intervention in Dementia: Multimethods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence readiness and its relationship with thriving at work among Chinese nurses: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy in nursing: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: a position paper by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- From bedside to bytes: the digital transformation of the healthcare workforce.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: Support or Additional Burden on Physicians' Healthcare Work?-A Qualitative Study.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Personalized AI for workplace health promotion: performance management and healthcare worker engagement through digital analytics.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Confirmatory factor analyses of the Mandarin Chinese version of the perceived stressors in intensive care units among healthcare professionals.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Can artificial intelligence revolutionize healthcare in the Global South? A scoping review of opportunities and challenges.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe escalating global scarcity of skilled health care professionals is a critical concern, further exacerbated by rising stress levels and clinician burnout rates. Artificial intelligence (AI) has surfaced as a potential resource to alleviate these challenges. Nevertheless, it is not taken for granted that AI will inevitably augment human performance, as ill-designed systems may inadvertently impose new burdens on health care workers, and implementation may be challenging. An in-depth understanding of how AI can effectively enhance rather than impair work conditions is therefore needed.
objectiveThis research investigates the efficacy of AI in alleviating stress and enriching work conditions, using intensive care units (ICUs) as a case study. Through a sociotechnical system lens, we delineate how AI systems, tasks, and responsibilities of ICU nurses and physicians can be co-designed to foster motivating, resilient, and health-promoting work.
methodsWe use the sociotechnical system framework COMPASS (Complementary Analysis of Sociotechnical Systems) to assess 5 job characteristics: autonomy, skill diversity, flexibility, problem-solving opportunities, and task variety. The qualitative analysis is underpinned by extensive workplace observation in 6 ICUs (approximately 559 nurses and physicians), structured interviews with work unit leaders (n=12), and a comparative analysis of data science experts' and clinicians' evaluation of the optimal levels of human-AI teaming.
resultsThe results indicate that AI holds the potential to positively impact work conditions for ICU nurses and physicians in four key areas. First, autonomy is vital for stress reduction, motivation, and performance improvement. AI systems that ensure transparency, predictability, and human control can reinforce or amplify autonomy. Second, AI can encourage skill diversity and competence development, thus empowering clinicians to broaden their skills, increase the polyvalence of tasks across professional boundaries, and improve interprofessional cooperation. However, careful consideration is required to avoid the deskilling of experienced professionals. Third, AI automation can expand flexibility by relieving clinicians from administrative duties, thereby concentrating their efforts on patient care. Remote monitoring and improved scheduling can help integrate work with other life domains. Fourth, while AI may reduce problem-solving opportunities in certain areas, it can open new pathways, particularly for nurses. Finally, task identity and variety are essential job characteristics for intrinsic motivation and worker engagement but could be compromised depending on how AI tools are designed and implemented.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates AI's capacity to mitigate stress and improve work conditions for ICU nurses and physicians, thereby contributing to resolving health care staffing shortages. AI solutions that are thoughtfully designed in line with the principles for good work design can enhance intrinsic motivation, learning, and worker well-being, thus providing strategic value for hospital management, policy makers, and health care professionals alike.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.