Evidence mapPaperPMID 39805691Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025

Primary Care Physicians' Responses to Treatment Burden in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Video Analysis in China.

Kai Lin, Mi Yao, Lesley Andrew, Runqi Lin, Rouyan Li, Yilin Chen, Xinxin Ji, Jacques Oosthuizen, Moira Sim, Yongsong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kai LinFamily Medicine Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Mi YaoGeneral Practice, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lesley AndrewSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia.
Runqi LinFamily Medicine Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Rouyan LiFamily Medicine Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yilin ChenFamily Medicine Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Xinxin JiFamily Medicine Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Jacques OosthuizenSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia.
Moira SimSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia m.sim@ecu.edu.au.
Yongsong ChenEndocrinology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China yongsongchen@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to examine the approaches general practitioners (GPs) use to respond to the treatment burden faced by people with type 2 diabetes.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 29 videos of GP-patient consultations in an academic general practice clinic in China. Thematic analysis and a framework matrix approach were used to identify patterns in GPs' responses to the identified issues.

resultsThe median length of the 29 video-recorded consultations was 23 minutes 54 seconds. We identified 77 segments focusing on discussions about treatment burden. In 37.7% of these segments, the GP elicited and responded to discussions about treatment burden, whereas in 23.4%, the patient initiated the discussion and the GP responded to it, leaving 39.0% in which the patient initiated the discussion but the GP did not respond. In thematic analysis, medication was the component of treatment burden most frequently identified by both patients and GPs, followed by personal resources, medical information, and administrative burden. General practitioners used 12 response approaches to address patients' treatment burden. The most frequently used included active listening and nonverbal skills, shared decision making, and confidence and self-efficacy support, which were broadly applied across various issues. In contrast, GPs typically reserved health record management, motivational interviewing, and awareness of the patient's background for specific issues.

conclusionsIn clinical encounters, GPs used a wide variety of approaches to respond to different aspects of the treatment burden of type 2 diabetes. Our findings emphasize the need to improve GPs' response strategies through increased responsiveness and more rapid surfacing of issues during visits.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Physician-Patient RelationsPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChinaCost of IllnessDecision Making, SharedFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRetrospective Studiesclinical responseclinical skillscommunicationcounselingdiabetes mellitus type 2general practitionersillness burdenoffice visitspatient-centered carepatient-physician relationspractice-based researchprimary caretreatment burdenvideo analysis

Identifiers

PMID39805691
PMCPMC11772023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.