ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Natural language processing to identify suicidal ideation and anhedonia in major depressive disorder.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble of transformers for depression emotion classification.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Practical Guide to Large Language Models for Information Extraction in Behavioral Health Notes: Tutorial.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- The Effects of Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assessment of Outpatient Mental Health Services on Human Auditors.Applied clinical informatics · 2026Article
- Leveraging reddit data for context-enhanced synthetic health data generation to identify low self esteem.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnhedonia and suicidal ideation are symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) that are not regularly captured in structured scales but may be captured in unstructured clinical notes. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques may be used to extract longitudinal data on suicidal behaviors and anhedonia within unstructured clinical notes. This study assessed the accuracy of using NLP techniques on electronic health records (EHRs) to identify these symptoms among patients with MDD.
methodsEHR-derived, de-identified data were used from the NeuroBlu Database (version 23R1), a longitudinal behavioral health real-world database. Mental health clinicians annotated instances of anhedonia and suicidal symptoms in clinical notes creating a ground truth. Interrater reliability (IRR) was calculated using Krippendorff's alpha. A novel transformer architecture-based NLP model was trained on clinical notes to recognize linguistic patterns and contextual cues. Each sentence was categorized into one of four labels: (1) anhedonia; (2) suicidal ideation without intent or plan; (3) suicidal ideation with intent or plan; (4) absence of suicidal ideation or anhedonia. The model was assessed using positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC.
resultsThe model was trained, tested, and validated on 2,198, 1,247, and 1,016 distinct clinical notes, respectively. IRR was 0.80. For anhedonia, suicidal ideation with intent or plan, and suicidal ideation without intent or plan the model achieved a PPV of 0.98, 0.93, and 0.87, an F1-score of 0.98, 0.91, and 0.89 during training and a PPV of 0.99, 0.95, and 0.87 and F1-score of 0.99, 0.95, and 0.89 during validation.
conclusionsNLP techniques can leverage contextual information in EHRs to identify anhedonia and suicidal symptoms in patients with MDD. Integrating structured and unstructured data offers a comprehensive view of MDD's trajectory, helping healthcare providers deliver timely, effective interventions. Addressing current limitations will further enhance NLP models, enabling more accurate extraction of critical clinical features and supporting personalized, proactive mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.