Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39807350›Full record

ReviewAnimal cells and systems2025

Advances in modeling cellular state dynamics: integrating omics data and predictive techniques.

Sungwon Jung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cells and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sungwon JungDepartment of Genome Medicine and Science, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-554X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic modeling of cellular states has emerged as a pivotal approach for understanding complex biological processes such as cell differentiation, disease progression, and tissue development. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current approaches for modeling cellular state dynamics, focusing on techniques ranging from dynamic or static biomolecular network models to deep learning models. We highlight how these approaches integrated with various omics data such as transcriptomics, and single-cell RNA sequencing could be used to capture and predict cellular behavior and transitions. We also discuss applications of these modeling approaches in predicting gene knockout effects, designing targeted interventions, and simulating organ development. This review emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate modeling strategies based on scalability and resolution requirements, which vary according to the complexity and size of biological systems under study. By evaluating strengths, limitations, and recent advancements of these methodologies, we aim to guide future research in developing more robust and interpretable models for understanding and manipulating cellular state dynamics in various biological contexts, ultimately advancing therapeutic strategies and precision medicine.

Indexed as

cell phenotype modelingcellular reprogrammingCellular state dynamicsdisease progression modeling

Identifiers

PMID39807350
PMCPMC11727055

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.