ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2024
Randomized Pilot Study Examining an Online Diet Intervention to Increase Intake of Fruits and Vegetables Among Healthy Adults.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intake of fruits and vegetables (F&V) is related to health outcomes. The purpose of the study was to test an online diet program promoting F&V intake among healthy adults. Twenty-three participants were randomly assigned to complete an 8-week intervention condition (#800gChallenge®) or wait-list control condition. In weeks 1-4, intervention participants were asked to interact with an application reporting (a) whether they met their daily 800g F&V goal, (b) if their 800g of F&V was from a variety of sources, and (c) reading of daily educational material. Weeks 1-4 included weekly Zoom check-in meetings. Weeks 5-8 were autonomous, wherein participants reported in the application information regarding their 800g F&V goal. At baseline, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks, the participants were prompted to complete three Automated Self-Administered Dietary Assessment tool (ASA24) 24-hour diet recalls for generating Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores indicating diet quality. A two-way ANOVA was used to examine differences between the intervention and control groups in HEI total score, total vegetable, total fruit, and whole fruit component scores at baseline, 4-weeks, and 8-weeks. While no statistically significant differences in HEI scores were observed between groups, the intervention group showed promising improvements over the 8-week period. Notably, the intervention group increased their mean HEI total score, along with substantial gains in their total vegetable and total fruit consumption, indicating the intervention's potential for promoting healthier dietary patterns. These findings underscore the need for ongoing research to develop eHealth interventions of optimal duration and intensity that can drive meaningful improvements in the health of adults with poor diet quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.