ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Identifying cancer prognosis genes through causal learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of causal genes for cancer prognosis is critical for estimating disease progression and guiding treatment interventions. In this study, we propose CPCG (Cancer Prognosis's Causal Gene), a two-stage framework identifying gene sets causally associated with patient prognosis across diverse cancer types using transcriptomic data. Initially, an ensemble approach models gene expression's impact on survival with parametric and semiparametric hazard models. Subsequently, an iterative conditional independence test combined with graph pruning is utilized to infer the causal skeleton, thereby pinpointing prognosis-related genes. Experiments on transcriptomic data from 18 cancer types sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project demonstrate CPCG's effectiveness in predicting prognosis under four evaluation metrics. Validations on 24 additional datasets covering 12 cancer types from the Gene Expression Omnibus and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas Project further demonstrate CPCG's robustness and generalizability. CPCG identifies a concise but reliable set of genes, obviating the need for gene combination enumeration for survival time estimation. These genes are also proved closely linked to crucial biological processes in cancer. Moreover, CPCG constructs a stable causal skeleton and exhibits insensitivity to the order of data shuffling. Overall, CPCG is a powerful tool for extracting cancer prognostic biomarkers, offering interpretability, generalizability, and robustness. CPCG holds promise for facilitating targeted interventions in clinical treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.