Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39808195›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Fracture liaison service (FLS) is associated with lower subsequent fragility fracture risk and mortality: NoFRACT (the Norwegian capture the fracture initiative).

Camilla Andreasen, Cecilie Dahl, Frede Frihagen, Tove T Borgen, Trude Basso, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Wender Figved, Torbjørn Wisløff, Gunhild Hagen, Ellen M Apalset and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adherence to secondary fracture prevention is associated with reduced risk of subsequent fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Camilla AndreasenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Cecilie DahlDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Frede FrihagenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Tove T BorgenDepartment of Rheumatology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway.
Trude BassoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Jan-Erik GjertsenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Wender FigvedInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torbjørn WisløffInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gunhild HagenDepartment of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ellen M ApalsetBergen Group of Epidemiology and Biomarkers in Rheumatic Disease, Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jens M StutzerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Hospital of Molde, Molde, Norway.
Ida LundDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ann K HansenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Frida I NissenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ragnar M JoakimsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Unni SyversenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik F EriksenSpesialistsenteret Pilestredet Park, Oslo, Norway.
Lars NordslettenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tone K OmslandDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Åshild BjørneremDepartment of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Lene Bergendal SolbergDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. lenser@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8705-5033

Funding

Helse Nord RHF 14083Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2017032Norges Forskningsråd 243852St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim 46055600-51Vestre Viken Helseforetak 19003007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subsequent fracture rates and associated mortality were compared before and after the introduction of fracture liaison service (FLS). In 100,198 women and men, FLS was associated with 13% and 10% lower risk of subsequent fragility fractures and 18% and 15% lower mortality. The study suggests that FLS may prevent fractures. PURPOSE: Efficient fracture prevention strategies are warranted to control the global fracture burden. We investigated the effect of a standardized fracture liaison service (FLS) intervention on subsequent fracture risk and mortality.

methodsThe NoFRACT study was designed as a multicenter, pragmatic, register-supported, stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial. The FLS intervention was introduced in three clusters with 4-month intervals starting May 2015 through December 2018 and included evaluation of osteoporosis and treatment in patients over 50 years with a low-energy fracture. Based on data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, patients with index fractures were assigned to the control period (2011-2015) or intervention period (2015-2018) depending on the time of fracture. Rates of subsequent fragility fractures (distal forearm, proximal humerus, or hip) and all-cause mortality were calculated.

resultsA total of 100,198 patients (mean age 69.6 years) suffered an index fracture of any type. During a maximum follow-up of 4.7 years, 11% (6948) of the women and 6% (2014) of the men experienced a subsequent fragility fracture, and 20% (14,324) of the women and 22% (8,326) of the men died. FLS was associated with 13% lower subsequent fragility fracture risk in women (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.83-0.92) and 10% in men (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99) and 18% lower mortality in women (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.86) and 15% in men (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.89).

conclusionA standardized FLS intervention was associated with a lower risk of subsequent fragility fractures and mortality and may contribute to reduce the global fracture burden.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesSecondary PreventionAgedAged, 80 and overBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayOsteoporosisRegistriesRisk AssessmentBone Density Conservation Agentsfracture liaison servicefragility fracturesosteoporosispost-fracture mortalitysecondary fracture preventionstepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial

Identifiers

PMID39808195
PMCPMC11882684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.