ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting gallbladder adenoma.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differential diagnosis of gallbladder cholesterol polyps and adenomas using contrast-enhanced ultrasound-morphology and perfusion features.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGallbladder cholesterol polyp (GCP) and gallbladder adenoma (GA) are easily confused in clinical diagnosis. This study aims to establish a nomogram prediction model for preoperative prediction of the risk of GA patients. STUDY
designWe retrospectively collected clinical data of GCP or GA patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between January 2020 and April 2023. We compared and analyzed the differences between the GCP group and the GA group. The data were divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Independent risk factors were determined using LASSO and Logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram model was established. The model was comprehensively validated and evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow test and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThis study ultimately included 497 patients. The independent predictors of the nomogram model include blood type (O-type blood, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.02-3.94; P = 0.046), number of lesions (solitary, OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.12; P = 0.033), sessile polyp (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.06-3.92; P = 0.033), age (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.20; P < 0.001), diameter (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.17-1.45; P < 0.001). For the training and validation set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.843 and 0.837, respectively, and the P-value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.056 and 0.300, respectively. In addition, the calibration curve and DCA curve indicate that the model has accurate predictive ability and reliable clinical practicality.
conclusionsThe blood type, number of lesions, sessile polyp, age and diameter are significant risk factors for GA. This nomogram model can use simple and readily available clinical data to predict the risk of having GA and can assist in guiding surgical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39808305What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.