Trial reportESC heart failure2025
The ADESTE trial: A phase 2 study of enibarcimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting adrenomedullin, in acute heart failure.
Trial report in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ADESTE trial: A phase 2 study of enibarcimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting adrenomedullin, in acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Trial
- Proteomic Signatures of High-Risk Coronary Plaque Features and Incident Events.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to conduct a phase 2 proof-of-concept and safety study to evaluate the effect of ENIBARCIMAB (EN), a non-neutralizing humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the N-terminus of adrenomedullin (ADM), administered immediately after stabilization with standard of care (SoC) treatment, in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND
resultsThis prospective, open-label, controlled, interventional, multicenter, dose-escalation study was conducted at two cardiology sites in Indonesia. Patients were divided into two interventional groups sequentially receiving 0.5 mg/kg (SoC + EN 0.5 mg/kg, n = 10; first cohort) and 2 mg/kg (SoC + EN 2 mg/kg, n = 10; second cohort) of EN via 1-h intravenous (IV) infusion within 48 h after admission for AHF. The control group (n = 10) was treated with SoC therapy for AHF therapy. All patients were monitored continuously within 24 h post-infusion and subsequent daily until discharge. Treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded during hospitalization and up to 90 days after discharge. Both EN dosages were well-tolerated, and no significant safety issues were identified during hospitalization and up to 90 days of follow up. SAEs occurred in 10% of patients in each EN group but were deemed not related to treatment. No significant differences in the occurrence of SAEs were found between the groups. Five deaths occurred: three (30%) in the control group as compared with two deaths (20%) in the SoC + EN 2 mg/kg group. EN led to a significant increase in plasma bio-ADM levels within 24 h post-infusion, with the SoC + 2 mg/kg group showing the highest increase. Within 1 h from IV EN infusion, SoC + EN 2 mg/kg compared with 0.5 mg/kg, resulted in a significant percentage reduction in systolic, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. However, it did not result in severe hypotension and the need for drug discontinuation.
conclusionsIn this pilot safety study of patients hospitalized for AHF, IV infusion of EN 0.5 and 2 mg/kg increased circulating plasma bio-ADM levels and was well-tolerated without treatment-related SAEs occurring during hospitalization and up to 90 days after discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.