SynthesisSystematic reviews2025
The role of pharmacists in mitigating medication errors in the perioperative setting: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical pharmacology consultations and their implementation in clinical decision making.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Future pharmacists and climate action: a qualitative study of students' views on environmental sustainability in education and practice.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications to Remove Disruptive Factors from Pharmaceutical Care: A Quantitative Study in Eastern Romania.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Use of intravenous antibiotics for the management of suspected chorioamnionitis: insights from women's wellness and research center.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Economic impact of medication management by clinical pharmacists in a urology department.Central European journal of urology · 2026Article
- Personalized Multimodal and Opioid-Sparing Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management: Enhancing Recovery and Addressing the Post-Discharge Gap.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- What leads to medication errors in polish hospitals from the perspectives of nurses? a multicenter cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Medication Reconciliation in the Surgical Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study in Polymedicated Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedication errors occur at any point of the medication management process and are a major cause of death and harm globally. The perioperative environment introduces challenges in identifying medication errors due to the frequent use of time-sensitive, high-alert medications in a dynamic and intricate setting. Pharmacists could potentially reduce the occurrence of these errors because of their training and expertise.
aimTo provide the most up-to-date evidence on the roles and effects of pharmacist interventions on medication errors in perioperative settings.
methodsPubMed, CINAHL, and Embase were searched from inception to September 2023. Studies were included if they tested a pharmacist-led intervention aimed at reducing medication errors in adult perioperative settings. The included studies were assessed for quality using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. Data were extracted and synthesized using the DEPICT-2 (Descriptive Elements of Pharmacist Intervention Characterization Tool). Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers.
resultsSixteen studies were eligible. All included studies incorporated multicomponent interventions, primarily medication reconciliation (n = 13), medicine-related recommendations (n = 12), staff education (n = 6), and patient counselling (n = 4). The development of implemented interventions was poorly reported across all papers. A diverse range of error reporting was observed, and none of the included studies provided definitions or basis for the categorization of errors. Although the studies showed that pharmacist interventions were associated with a reduction in overall medication errors rates, some studies showed inconsistent findings regarding error subtypes. The most common pharmacist intervention was medication optimization via holding or switching between agents.
conclusionWhile there is some evidence of positive impact of the pharmacist-led interventions on medication errors in perioperative setting, this evidence is generally of low quality and insufficient volume. Heterogeneity in study design, definitions, and case detection is common; hence, high-quality research that applies more stringent controls and uses clearer definitions is warranted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023460812.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.