ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Assessment of Exhaled Breath Condensate for ALK, RET, ROS1, and NTRK1 Fusion Transcript Detection in NSCLC: Comparison With Tissue and Liquid Biopsy Samples.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer continues to be the primary cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with the majority of cases identified at advanced stages. Genetic alterations, including mutations and gene fusions, are central to its molecular pathogenesis. The discovery of therapeutically targetable gene fusions, such as ALK, RET, ROS1, and NTRK1, has significantly advanced lung cancer management. Conventional methods, such as tissue biopsies, are invasive and unsuitable for continuous molecular monitoring. Consequently, noninvasive approaches, such as liquid biopsies and exhaled breath condensate (EBC), offer promising options for real-time molecular surveillance.
methodsThis study evaluates the feasibility of identifying fusion transcripts in 30 patients with lung adenocarcinoma by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, plasma, and EBC samples.
resultsClinically significant fusion transcripts, including KIF5B-ALK, KIF5B-RET, and SQSTM1-ALK, were detected across different sample types. EBC samples showed strong concordance with tissue biopsy results, particularly in detecting ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions, and demonstrated greater sensitivity than plasma in detecting NTRK1 fusions. Additionally, 30 fusion transcripts of uncertain clinical significance were identified, highlighting the need for further research into their role in lung cancer pathogenesis.
conclusionIn conclusion, EBC samples provide a valuable, noninvasive medium for detecting clinically relevant and previously uncharacterized fusion transcripts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The high concordance between EBC and tissue biopsies suggests that EBC could complement tissue biopsy for effective diagnosis and monitoring of NSCLC. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive molecular profiling using multiple sample types to enhance diagnostic precision and optimize therapeutic outcomes in lung cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.