ReviewNeurology. Genetics2025
Current Advances and Challenges in Gene Therapies for Neurologic Disorders: A Review for the Clinician.
Review in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroprotective roles of klotho: Molecular pathways and therapeutic implications for cognitive health in neurological and psychiatric diseases.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Three Years of a New Multidisciplinary Adult Neurogenetics Clinic in Singapore.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Recent Developments in Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Biotherapeutics and Gene Therapy Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Klotho in aging and diseases: molecular features, expressions, and functional implications.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Bridging science and hope: the evolving story of gene therapy for neuromuscular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Monogenic Mimics of Neuroinflammatory Phenotypes in Children and Young Adults: An Evolving Landscape.Neurology. Genetics · 2025Review
- Removal of Toxic Metabolites-Chelation: Manganese Disorders.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
- Genomic medicine in hepatology: mechanisms and liver treatment strategies.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Ten Years ofNeurology. Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over 300 million people globally are affected by rare diseases, many of which present predominantly with neurologic symptoms. Rare neurologic disorders pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges including delayed diagnoses, limited treatment options, and a shortage of specialists. However, advancements in diagnostics, particularly next-generation sequencing and expansion of newborn screening, have significantly shortened the time to diagnosis for many of these disorders. Concurrently, the past decade has witnessed exponential development of new treatments for rare neurologic diseases, with several approved gene therapies and more trials under way. A range of targeted therapies now offers hope for not only symptomatic management but also for disease modification. As treatments transition from clinical trials to clinical practice, the responsibility of identifying and monitoring patients may increasingly fall on the general neurologists. This evolving therapeutic landscape highlights the urgent need to enhance our understanding of this new class of medications and the details on clinical eligibility and monitoring of patients with diseases that have approved gene therapies. This article provides a comprehensive overview of gene-targeted therapies currently available for neurologic disorders, with a focus on their mechanisms, challenges, and post-treatment considerations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.