ArticlePhotoacoustics2025
Use of pattern recognition in photoacoustic imaging to identify neuronal ensembles in the prefrontal cortex of rats undergoing conditioned fear learning.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pattern recognition analysis in brain research has improved understanding of sensory processing and led to the identification of default brain networks in neuroimaging studies. The current study uses pattern recognition analysis to extend our previous findings showing conditioned fear learning and novelty-exposure (i.e. sham conditioning) equally increase Fos-dependent neuronal ensemble signal intensity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of rats as quantified by photoacoustic imaging (e.g. functional/molecular photoacoustic tomography). Here we use similarity metrics-based pattern recognition analysis to determine if neuronal ensemble activation patterns in the PFC are unique fear-conditioned compared to sham-conditioned rats. Our results show that a qualitatively-unique pattern in signal intensity exists only for the fear-conditioned group compared to sham-conditioned, behaviourally-naïve, or fear-conditioned vehicle control groups. These findings suggest that while the PFC is involved equally in novelty-exposure and fear learning, only highly coordinated behavioral tasks engage the PFC in a homogenous pattern of activity. This study also highlights the use of pattern recognition analysis using photoacoustic imaging data leading the way for future use of this computational approach to brain imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.