ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2025
Patient experience with acute hepatic porphyria before and after long-term givosiran treatment in a qualitative interview study.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute hepatic porphyria (AHP) is characterized by debilitating and potentially life-threatening neurovisceral attacks, possible chronic symptoms, and long-term complications. In a phase 1/2 open-label extension (OLE) study and the phase 3 ENVISION study, givosiran led to sustained improvement in annualized attack rate and quality of life (QOL) measures. To capture the patient experience of symptoms and impacts of AHP, and any changes experienced during treatment with givosiran, qualitative interviews were conducted with study participants. Methods: Participants who continued givosiran treatment after completing the phase 1/2 OLE study and the phase 3 ENVISION study participated in semi-structured interviews (i.e., loosely structured interviews on a predetermined topic without strict adherence to wording or order of questions) in 2022 that were developed and executed by RTI Health Solutions. Transcripts were assessed using thematic analysis methods. Authors/investigators categorized symptoms as likely acute attack-related or chronic based on the participants' descriptions. Select clinical trial results (baseline characteristics and QOL scores from the phase 1/2 and ENVISION studies) from interview participants were compiled. Results: Duration of givosiran treatment in the 21 participants at the time of interview was approximately 4-5 years (mean [SD], 51.8 [7.9] months; median [range], 49.7 [41.4, 69.1] months). Participants reported experiencing AHP symptoms prior to the phase 1/2 OLE or phase 3 studies, including abdominal pain ( Conclusions: Participants reported meaningful improvements in AHP symptoms, increased QOL, and reduced opioid use with long-term monthly givosiran treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.