ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2024
Advances in lysosomal escape mechanisms for gynecological cancer nano-therapeutics.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rational design of lipid-based nanoparticles for targeted anticancer therapies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Light-Controlled Membrane Fusion in Synthetic Cells.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing the frontiers of ovarian cancer therapy: a comprehensive synthesis of emerging cell death paradigms.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Recent development of nanotechnology-based approaches for gynecologic cancer therapy.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecological cancers present significant treatment challenges due to drug resistance and adverse side effects. This review explores advancements in lysosomal escape mechanisms, essential for enhancing nano-therapeutic efficacy. Strategies such as pH-sensitive linkers and membrane fusion are examined, showcasing their potential to improve therapeutic outcomes in ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancers. We delve into novel materials and strategies developed to bypass the lysosomal barrier, including pH-sensitive linkers, fusogenic lipids, and nanoparticles (NPs) engineered for endosomal disruption. Mechanisms such as the proton sponge effect, where NPs induce osmotic swelling and rupture of the lysosomal membrane, and membrane fusion, which facilitates the release of therapeutic agents directly into the cytoplasm, are explored in detail. These innovations not only promise to improve therapeutic outcomes but also minimize side effects, marking a significant step forward in the treatment of ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancers. By providing a comprehensive analysis of current advancements and their implications for clinical applications, this review sheds light on the potential of lysosomal escape strategies to revolutionize gynecological cancer treatment, setting the stage for future research and development in this vital area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.