Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811511›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Consequences, mechanisms, and treatment of intestinal dysbiosis.

Ze-Long Zheng, Qing-Fan Zheng, Li-Qiang Wang, Yi Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probiotics Accelerate Microbiota and Metabolic Pathway Recovery Following Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation in Ulcerative Colitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ze-Long ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology (Endoscopy Center), China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin Province, China.
Qing-Fan ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology (Endoscopy Center), China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin Province, China. zhengqingfan@jlu.edu.cn.
Li-Qiang WangDepartment of Gastroenterology (Endoscopy Center), China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin Province, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology (Endoscopy Center), China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "gut microbiota" primarily refers to the ecological community of various microorganisms in the gut, which constitutes the largest microbial community in the human body. Although adequate bowel preparation can improve the results of colonoscopy, it may interfere with the gut microbiota. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy can lead to transient changes in the gut microbiota, potentially affecting an individual's health, especially in vulnerable populations, such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, measures such as oral probiotics may ameliorate these adverse effects. We focused on the bowel preparation-induced changes in the gut microbiota and host health status, hypothesized the factors influencing these changes, and attempted to identify measures that may reduce dysbiosis, thereby providing more information for individualized bowel preparation for colonoscopy in the future.

Indexed as

CatharticsColonoscopyDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesProbioticsCatharticsBowel preparationColonoscopyInflammatory bowel diseaseMicrobiotaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39811511
PMCPMC11684204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.