Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39811604›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

Perspectives on the use of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized human perinatal tissues for bone repair: Advantages and remaining challenges.

Lauriana Solecki, Mathilde Fenelon, Halima Kerdjoudj, Roberta Di Pietro, Gianmarco Stati, Camille Gaudet, Eugenie Bertin, Jeremie Nallet, Aurélien Louvrier, Thomas Gualdi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lauriana SoleckiCHU Besançon, Service d'Ophtalmologie, F-25000 Besançon, France.
Mathilde FenelonUniversité de Bordeaux, INSERM, BIOTIS, U1026, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Halima KerdjoudjUniversité de Reims Champagne Ardenne, Biomatériaux et Inflammation en Site Osseux (BIOS) EA 4691, F-51100 Reims, France.
Roberta Di PietroDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Gianmarco StatiDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Camille GaudetCHU Besançon, Service de chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Stomatologie et Odontologie Hospitalière, F-25000 Besançon, France.
Eugenie BertinCHU Besançon, Service de chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, Stomatologie et Odontologie Hospitalière, F-25000 Besançon, France.
Jeremie NalletCHU Besançon, Service de chirurgie Pédiatrique, F-25000 Besançon, France.
Aurélien LouvrierUniversité de Franche-Comté, Laboratoire SINERGIES, F-25000 Besançon, France.
Thomas GualdiCHU Besancon, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Inserm CIC 1431, F 25000 Besançon, France.
Jessica Schiavi-TritzUniversity of Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Florelle GindrauxUniversité de Franche-Comté, Laboratoire SINERGIES, F-25000 Besançon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human amniotic membrane (hAM) has been extensively used for several decades as a bioactive scaffold for regenerative medicine. In its cryopreserved form-one of the main storage formats-the presence of viable cells has often been questioned. Furthermore, there is little published evidence of the role of endogenous amniotic cells from cryopreserved hAM in tissue repair. Some technologies, often patented and combined, have facilitated the use of hAM. Decellularization and devitalization processes have been developed to ensure its safety and prevent immune rejection. Lyophilization and dehydration methods have had a significant impact on clinical practices by enabling storage at room temperature in the operating room and making handling and cutting easier. Consequently, the commercialization of hAM has expanded, initially in the USA, and now in Europe. In the last decade, there has been growing interest in new perinatal tissues in clinical medicine. Similar processes have been adapted for these tissues to prevent immune or inflammatory reactions, and to improve storage and make them easier to use. For example, in the USA, many products marketed for wound healing undergo lyophilization, sometimes in combination with decellularization. Given our expertise, we wanted to highlight the potential of decellularized/devitalized and lyophilized perinatal tissues in regenerative medicine, particularly for bone repair. In this opinion paper, we discuss why these tissues represent the future of regenerative medicine, their potential drawbacks and strategies to overcome these challenges.

Indexed as

Amniotic membraneChorionMedical devicePerinatal derivativesPlacentaRegulationTissue graftUmbilical cordWharton's jelly

Identifiers

PMID39811604
PMCPMC11732169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.