ReviewBeilstein journal of organic chemistry2025
Emerging trends in the optimization of organic synthesis through high-throughput tools and machine learning.
Review in Beilstein journal of organic chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Impact of Continuous Flow Technology and Collaboration between Academia and Industry.JACS Au · 2026Review
- Polycondensation as a Universal Method for Preparing High-Density Single-Atom Catalyst Libraries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- AI, agentic models and lab automation for scientific discovery - the beginning of scAInce.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Adaptive experimentation and optimization in organic chemistry.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of the optimal conditions for chemical reactions is a labor-intensive, time-consuming task that requires exploring a high-dimensional parametric space. Historically, the optimization of chemical reactions has been performed by manual experimentation guided by human intuition and through the design of experiments where reaction variables are modified one at a time to find the optimal conditions for a specific reaction outcome. Recently, a paradigm change in chemical reaction optimization has been enabled by advances in lab automation and the introduction of machine learning algorithms. Therein, multiple reaction variables can be synchronously optimized to obtain the optimal reaction conditions, requiring a shorter experimentation time and minimal human intervention. Herein, we review the currently used state-of-the-art high-throughput automated chemical reaction platforms and machine learning algorithms that drive the optimization of chemical reactions, highlighting the limitations and future opportunities of this new field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.