ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Preventive Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Interactions With Health Care in Patients Who Develop Premature Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Ounce of Prevention for a Pound of Cure?: Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Premature Coronary Disease.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rates of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) are stagnant, and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in young and middle-aged adults is increasing. Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is effective in preventing CAD but is underutilized in younger patients. The reasons for and consequences of this underutilization are not fully understood. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to assess prepresentation health care encounters, eligibility for, usage patterns, and predictors of initiation of LLT and its relationships with the severity of clinical presentation of CAD. Methods: Using administrative databases and a clinical registry, we analyzed health care encounters, cardiovascular risk, and medication dispensations in females <55 and males <50 years old who presented with angiographically confirmed premature CAD. Results: Among 11,445 patients (27.6% females, age 46.14 ± 5.05 years) in the administrative database, in the 3 years before presentation, 93.3% were eligible for lipid screening and 92.2% had health care visits, but only 14.8% received LLT dispensations, and 5.9% displayed good adherence. In multivariable analysis, females (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.86), rural residents (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.62-0.91), and smokers (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.57-0.74) were less likely to receive LLT. High-intensity LLT vs no LLT was associated with lower odds of presenting with acute coronary syndrome (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.19-0.38). Among 470 clinical registry participants (27.4% females, mean age 45.72 ± 5.07 years), 70.2% had lipids assessed, 55.7% were eligible for LLT based on the estimated cardiovascular risk, 18.9% received treatment recommendations, and 12.1% received dispensations of LLT before presentation. Conclusions: Prior to presenting with premature CAD, most patients had medical encounters, but few received LLT, demonstrating a substantial gap in prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.