ArticleEndocrine-related cancer2025
Factors associated with grade progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Endocrine-related cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence versus conventional imaging for differentiating G2/G3 from G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Implications of Ki-67 Index, Grade and Hormonal Changes in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insights Into Tumor Heterogeneity Based on Primary and Secondary Lesions.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Article
- The impact of re-characterizing metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A prospective study.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- New Horizons: The Evolution of Nuclear Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of serological markers in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Shift in secretory profile of a pNET: from indolent glucagonoma to aggressive insulinoma - a case report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grade progression of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) can occur over time, with G1/2 to G3 being the most clinically relevant form. Here, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with initially G1/2 panNET (median initial Ki67, 4.6%). Patients were followed up for a median 6.8 years and had a median of two metachronous tumor biopsies over their disease course. 34.8% of patients underwent any form of grade progression, including G1 to G2/3 and G2 to G3, while 24.2% demonstrated G1/2 to G3 grade progression. Over a median 2.3 years, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors experienced a median Ki67 change of +27.0% (range, +6.4 to +48.7%). Subsequent biopsies showing progression to G3 had a median Ki67 value of 31.0% (range, 21.0-60.0%) and were more often performed following suspicious clinical behavior (75.0%) rather than routinely at the time of scheduled procedure/surgery (25.0%). Similar to prior studies, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors had worse overall survival from the time of metastatic disease (median, 4.8 years vs not reached for stably G1/2 disease; P = 0.002). Heavier pretreatment and heterogeneity or lack of uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging was independently associated with progression to G3. In the largest study of metachronous panNET biopsies to date, our findings show that baseline biopsies suggesting G1/2 disease may not accurately reflect future disease status, highlighting the possible limitations of using archived tissue to stratify patients into trials and/or choose future therapy. Additional work is needed to better understand the impact of prior therapies on grade progression and how to identify which lesions to best follow up for repeat biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.