Evidence mapPaperPMID 39813147Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025

The prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction: a prespecified substudy of the REDUCE-AMI trial.

Katarina Mars, Robin Hofmann, Martin Jonsson, Aristomenis Manouras, Jan Engvall, Troels Yndigegn, Tomas Jernberg, Kambiz Shahgaldi, Martin G Sundqvist

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katarina MarsDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset 10, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6739-1558
Robin HofmannDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset 10, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-895X
Martin JonssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset 10, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3539-8317
Aristomenis ManourasDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan EngvallDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, and Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Troels YndigegnDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8960-2125
Tomas JernbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1695-379X
Kambiz ShahgaldiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Danderyd Hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin G SundqvistDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset 10, 11883 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Swedish Heart Lung Foundation 2018:32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe REDUCE-AMI trial showed that beta-blockers in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) had no effect on mortality or cardiovascular outcomes. The aim of this substudy was to evaluate whether global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a better prognostic marker than LVEF, and if beta-blockers have a beneficial effect in patients with decreased GLS. METHODS AND

resultsREDUCE-AMI was a registry-based randomized clinical trial. Conventional echocardiographic parameters and GLS were obtained and a likelihood ratio test between models adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, previous AMI, and multi-vessel disease was used to compare LVEF and GLS as prognostic methods. A Cox regression model evaluated the impact of beta-blocker treatment on the composite endpoint of death from any cause or new AMI. A total of 1436 patients (28.6% of the total population) were included in this substudy. Due to poor image quality or incompatible equipment, 324 (22.6%) patients were excluded from the analysis of GLS. The median GLS was 17.3%. The likelihood ratio test resulted in no difference (P = 0.56) when comparing the combination of GLS to LVEF. The results were robust when adding beta-blocker randomization status as an independent variable.

conclusionIn patients after AMI with preserved LVEF, GLS did not add prognostic value regarding death from any cause or new AMI. In addition, beta-blocker treatment did not alter the prognostic information obtained from GLS. Consequently, this study does not support an additive value of GLS compared with standard echocardiographic measurement in this patient population.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsEchocardiographyMyocardial InfarctionStroke VolumeAgedFemaleGlobal Longitudinal StrainHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-Antagonistsacute myocardial infarctionbeta-blockersglobal longitudinal strainleft ventricular ejection fraction

Identifiers

PMID39813147
PMCPMC11950914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.