Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814565›Full record

ArticleACS nano2025

Solid-State Nanopore Real-Time Assay for Monitoring Cas9 Endonuclease Reactivity.

Chalmers C C Chau, Nicole E Weckman, Emma E Thomson, Paolo Actis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chalmers C C ChauBragg Centre for Materials Research, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-3134-6798
Nicole E WeckmanInstitute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice, Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-4926
Emma E ThomsonSchool of Bioscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, U.K.
Paolo ActisBragg Centre for Materials Research, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7146-1854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of nanopore sensing is now moving beyond nucleic acid sequencing. An exciting avenue is the use of nanopore platforms for the monitoring of biochemical reactions. Biological nanopores have been used for this application, but solid-state nanopore approaches have lagged. This is due to the necessity of using higher salt conditions (e.g., 4 M LiCl) to improve the signal-to-noise ratio which completely abolish the activities of many biochemical reactions. We pioneered a polymer electrolyte solid-state nanopore approach that maintains a high signal-to-noise ratio even at a physiologically relevant salt concentration. Here, we report the monitoring of the restriction enzyme SwaI and CRISPR-Cas9 endonuclease activities under physiological salt conditions and in real time. We investigated the dsDNA cleavage activity of these enzymes in a range of digestion buffers and elucidated the off-target activity of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein endonuclease in the presence of single base pair mismatches. This approach enables the application of solid-state nanopores for the dynamic monitoring of biochemical reactions under physiological salt conditions.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9NanoporesCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNACRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNACRISPRendonucleasenanoporepolymer electrolytesingle molecule

Identifiers

PMID39814565
PMCPMC11781028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.