ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Development of autonomic innervation at the venous pole of the heart: bridging the gap from mice to human.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Autonomic nervous system modulation in arrhythmias: mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrenatal development of autonomic innervation of sinus venosus-related structures might be related to atrial arrhythmias later in life. Most of the pioneering studies providing embryological background are conducted in animal models. To date, a detailed comparison with the human cardiac autonomic nervous system (cANS) is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the morphological and functional development of the cANS between mouse and human, specifically aimed at the venous pole.
methodsWildtype mouse embryos (E9.5-E18.5) and healthy human fetuses (6-38 weeks gestational age (WGA)) were studied at sequential stages to obtain a comparative developmental series. Cardiac autonomic function was assessed through heart rate variability (HRV) analysis using ultrasound. Morphological assessment of the venous pole was performed using immunohistochemical stainings for neural crest cells and autonomic nerve markers.
resultsMurine cANS function did not definitively establish in utero as HRV parameters depicted no trend prior to birth. In contrast, human HRV parameters greatly increased from 20 to 30 WGA, indicating that human cANS function is established prenatally around 20 WGA and matures thereafter. Morphologically, cANS development followed a similar sequence with neural crest-derived nerves entering the venous pole in proximity to the developing pulmonary vein in both species. However, the timing of differentiation into sympathetic or parasympathetic phenotype was markedly distinct, as human autonomic markers emerged relatively later when related to major cardiogenesis. Structures related to arrhythmogenicity in humans, such as the ligament/vein of Marshall and the myocardium surrounding the pulmonary veins, become highly innervated during embryonic development in both mice and humans.
conclusionAlthough early morphological cANS development at sinus venosus-related structures follows a similar sequence in mice and humans, there are substantial differences in the timing of functional establishment and differentiation in sympathetic and parasympathetic phenotypes, which should be taken into account when extrapolating mouse studies of the cANS to humans. The abundant innervation of sinus venosus-related structures may play a modulatory role in arrhythmogenesis under pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.