Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815328›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2025

Genome-wide association studies are enriched for interacting genes.

Peter T Nguyen, Simon G Coetzee, Irina Silacheva, Dennis J Hazelett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter T NguyenThe Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Simon G CoetzeeThe Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA.
Irina SilachevaThe Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Dennis J HazelettThe Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA. Dennis.Hazelett@csmc.edu.

Funding

Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
National Institutes of Health,United States R01LM010098NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith recent advances in single cell technology, high-throughput methods provide unique insight into disease mechanisms and more importantly, cell type origin. Here, we used multi-omics data to understand how genetic variants from genome-wide association studies influence development of disease. We show in principle how to use genetic algorithms with normal, matching pairs of single-nucleus RNA- and ATAC-seq, genome annotations, and protein-protein interaction data to describe the genes and cell types collectively and their contribution to increased risk.

resultsWe used genetic algorithms to measure fitness of gene-cell set proposals against a series of objective functions that capture data and annotations. The highest information objective function captured protein-protein interactions. We observed significantly greater fitness scores and subgraph sizes in foreground vs. matching sets of control variants. Furthermore, our model reliably identified known targets and ligand-receptor pairs, consistent with prior studies.

conclusionsOur findings suggested that application of genetic algorithms to association studies can generate a coherent cellular model of risk from a set of susceptibility variants. Further, we showed, using breast cancer as an example, that such variants have a greater number of physical interactions than expected due to chance.

Indexed as

Breast cancerComplex diseaseEtiologyGene networkGenetic algorithmsGWASMulti-omicsSusceptibilityVariant prioritization

Identifiers

PMID39815328
PMCPMC11734473

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.